Practical promotion economics

A seven-day campaign and 28-day baseline

Align the duration of a source benchmark before comparing campaign contribution. Inspect what duration normalization cannot fix.

Entirely synthetic case. The expected baseline and commercial inputs are deliberately supplied assumptions.

The decision

Are the promotion and benchmark windows comparable?

Product–campaign rows1
Contribution change€1,400
Gross unit lift42.9%

Source inputs

Campaign / productExpected baseline unitsPromotion unitsRegular / promotion priceVariable unit cost
Example home refill
Synthetic seven-day event
7001,000€20 / €18€8

What to inspect

Open a row’s full contribution bridge, check the day-window alignment and cost allocation, then vary the expected baseline and response in Scenario studio. The portfolio result includes the recorded refunds, supplier support and displacement; unrecorded effects remain excluded.

Read the accompanying decision guide

Interpretation limits

The figures are generated from the same deterministic engine used by the workbench. They are not evidence from a merchant or a randomized test. A supplied baseline can make an offer look attractive or unattractive, so the baseline deserves the same scrutiny as the campaign’s realized sales.

How to read this case

2,800 source units over 28 days become a 700-unit seven-day benchmark. The contribution difference is +€1,400.

Case-specific assumptions

  • The day-count adjustment is arithmetic normalization, not a seasonality or availability adjustment.
  • Replace the benchmark with an externally adjusted forecast when source days are not comparable.

Download the portable project JSON ↓